IL Motorcyclists Rights Association News

Leaders Report

redbar

mrf

Content and Image Copyright 2008, Motorcycle Riders Foundation

MRF E-MAIL NEWS
Motorcycle Riders Foundation
236 Massachusetts Ave. NE, Suite 510
P.O. Box 1808
Washington, DC 20013-1808
202-546-0983 (voice)
202-546-0986 (fax)
MRF website

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Jeff Hennie, Vice President of Government Relations
Email: Jeff Hennie

April 17, 2008

WASHINGTON UPDATE

The cherry blossoms near the Motorcycle Riders Foundation (MRF) office in Washington aren't the only tell tale signs that riding season is upon us. Springtime is also when the media begins to report on motorcycling, and more often than not they don't report on the vast number of positive aspects of motorcycling. Instead they choose to attempt to sour the image of motorcycling by painting a picture that motorcyclists are a social burden on the backs of the American taxpayer.

Critics and the uninformed believe that motorcyclists; helmeted or not, account for a super majority of health care costs from trauma rooms to long-term care. The problem is that's just not true. Not a lot of study has been done on the subject, but there is more than enough research out there to soundly and logically deflate the social burden myth.

The Journal of American Medicine, one of the most respected of all medical publications, published the findings of a 1988 study on the subject of the public costs of motorcycle-related injuries at a specific Seattle hospital. The results clearly showed that, on average for motorcycle-injured patients, 63.4 percent of their medical bills was paid out with taxpayer dollars. Admittedly that's an astoundingly high cost, but what the study goes on to say is that the average public cost of ANY injury at that same Seattle treatment center was 67 percent, 3.6 percent higher. A statistical dead heat.

There is also a little more to that story because generally the public cost of health care is about 45 percent currently, and it was significantly less than that in the mid eighties when the study was conducted. The facility used for the study was Harborview, a division of the University of Washington and one of the largest and most state of the art facilities in the Seattle region that sees most of the area’s worst case scenarios routinely.

A similar study done by the University of North Carolina also found that there was no statistical difference in public cost to treat motorcycle-related injuries over any other type of injury. Also important to keep things in perspective, last year the public share of motorcycle-related injuries was .001 percent of the entire public health care cost.

Then why are they making motorcyclists look like leeches on society? Usually it's an attempt to advance helmet laws or other restrictions on motorcycling. Those on that mission would be wrong to say that helmeted riders are much less of a financial burden than unhelmeted riders. According to a 1996 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) study, the unhelmeted riders generated a cost difference of 8 cents on the dollar more than helmeted riders, and most of that was paid for by private insurance.

So what have we learned? That the next time someone argues for the social burden theory, we can let him or her know that it's pure bunk.

redbar



Back to 2008 News Page

Back to Main Page

©I.M.R.A., Inc 2002-2008
All Rights Reserved